Differentiate between the silos approach and concurrent engineering approach to product design
Answer:
The silos approach and concurrent engineering approach are two different approaches to product design that have different implications for the design process.
The silos approach involves breaking down the product design process into separate, distinct stages, with each stage being handled by a different department or specialist. For example, one department might be responsible for conceptual design, another for detailed design, and another for manufacturing. Each department operates in its own "silo," with limited interaction with the other departments.
In contrast, the concurrent engineering approach takes a more integrated and cross-functional approach to product design. In concurrent engineering, all relevant departments and specialists work together from the beginning of the design process to ensure that all aspects of the product are considered and optimized simultaneously. This approach allows for early identification and resolution of design problems, and results in a more efficient and effective design process.
One of the key advantages of concurrent engineering is that it can help to reduce design cycle time and increase efficiency by allowing different departments to work on different aspects of the product at the same time. In contrast, the silos approach can lead to delays and inefficiencies as one department must wait for the other to finish before it can start its work. Additionally, the silos approach can result in sub-optimal design decisions, as different departments may make decisions that are optimal for their own silo, but not for the overall product.
Overall, the concurrent engineering approach is seen as a more modern and effective way to design products, while the silos approach is considered more traditional and less flexible.